JimDevlin
Dec 18 2003, 09:04 AM
QUOTE(Cudahy @ Dec 18 2003, 02:05 AM)
Reading this site, you'd never guess that the RedSox have the best offense in baseball - one that set the major league record for slugging. The desire to get Arod has distorted our perceptions. Everyone assumes we won't be able to get an extension on Nomar. Why? So he turned down a good deal a year ago and a not as good one a month ago. If the Arod deal doesn't go through Theo has 3 months to negotiate an extension. Nomar, understandably, pays very little attention to the media. Henry has plenty of time to get refocused.
Ahhh, some common sense at last.
A few folks on this board need to get a grip. Jumping off the Tobin? Puh-leeze. If this saga ends and Nomar and Manny are still members of the Red Sox, it is not the end of the world. Nomar is going to be motivated to put up big numbers to land his $15-18 million contract next offseason, and Manny is going to rake as he always has.
'But we're going to lose Nomar and get nothing but draft picks in return!' So? Should the Red Sox trade him now
just so we don't have to worry about him leaving without compensation? This thinking is a fiction. It's one thing if you have a non-contending team and know you're going to lose a valuable player - by all means, get what you can for that player. But if you are the 2004 Boston Red Sox, what is so terrible about taking advantage of a big year from Nomar at the 'bargain' price of $11.5 million, going for it all, and collect two additional high draft picks? That approach works for Billy Beane, doesn't it?
And don't worry about 'chemistry'. I really don't have a big issue with Kevin Millar's comments. Nomar has always seemed to keep to himself, so I can't see Millar's comments creating a huge rift on the team. The Sox have good hitting and good pitching, and the wins will come. That's where your 'good chemistry' comes from.
Relax, people. It's going to be a fun year, ARod or no ARod.
Jim D.
WallBallDouble
Dec 18 2003, 09:05 AM
QUOTE
I just don't see the wisdom of the Red Sox trading:
Manny Ramirez
Nomar Garciapara
Scott Williamson
Jon Lester plus giving away
$3-5 million in cash a year for 5 years ($15 million - $25 million)
for
Alex Rodriquez
Magglio Ordonez
Especially when you consider that it won't even improve the team's OPS statistics (the most important of all offensive statistics).
A couple things: it actually does improve the teams OPS. If you look at the combined 3 year AVG (2yr for Nomar) of Nomar/Manny vs. Arod/Ordonez, the Sox are going from a .944 OPS to a .970 OPS, not to mention upgrading two positions defensively. Also, according to a couple reports, the Sox would be getting (and keeping) top CWS prostpect Neal Cotts, and trading Lester in the Arod deal, so they upgrade a prospect. It is also reported that the deal isnt $5MM per year, but a one time payout of $5MM.
Add that to the fact that in all likelyhood, Nomar is leaving after 2004, and the Sox would then be faced w/ replacing an all star SS, and that is why this move makes sense, both for this year, and maybe even more for the near future.
ThePlayer
Dec 18 2003, 09:05 AM
What's the deal with the Nomar trade now. I thoughbt it was a done deal...conditional on the Arod/manny deal. Now Chi is saying it's not?
This is just too crazy........
Juice
Dec 18 2003, 09:09 AM
That's a great point. With or without A-Rod the offense will be spectacular, that is assuming Mueller brings it like he did last year.
Something I don't understand though. The union saying that we should have to add something beneficial to A-Rod if we take away money? How bout playing with a shot at a championship? Shouldn't that count for something? Ask Gary Payton or Karl Malone which is worth more!
MikeyMitch
Dec 18 2003, 09:10 AM
QUOTE(SoxTradeBait @ Dec 18 2003, 08:53 AM)
A-Rod didn't say much on the Today show, except he'd love to play in the Northeast where the fans are so passionate about baseball. Also was given Rangers, Sox, Yanks caps and quickly moved Yanks cap to bottom of stack and Sox on top.
Gotta like that. B)
Actually, he quickly moved the Texas hat on top. Nothing to read into, except that his statement that it's in the union and owners's hands means that Boras's statement to the AP this morning that the Sox need to up their offer is now A-Rod's opinion as well.
Leephus Pitch
Dec 18 2003, 09:13 AM
QUOTE(vafenway @ Dec 18 2003, 08:57 AM)
Agree on Manny showing in AZ...he'll probably forget his glove too...

That'd be nothing new. He forgot his glove most of last year, too.
rrsafety
Dec 18 2003, 09:16 AM
Below is a snapshot of the 2003 Red Sox starting nine. This team's average OPS based on the individual players career average OPS is .848
Damon, CF
Garciaparra, SS
Walker, 2B
Ramirez, LF
Ortiz, DH
Mueller, 3B
Varitek, C
Millar, 1B
Nixon, RF
Now, take a look at how a redesigned 2004 Red Sox would look assuming a pick up of A-Rod, Ordonez, and a middling second baseman with a career average OPS of .740. The OPS for the team actually DROPS to .834
Damon, CF
A-Rod, SS
Ordonez, RF
Anderson/Walker-type
Ortiz, DH
Mueller, 3B
Varitek, C
Millar, 1B
Nixon, LF
So, yes, picking up Foulke and Schilling is really important on the pitching side, but let's not fool ourselves into believing that these proposed trades improve our offense...they don't! And at what increased cost for 2004? With $$ going to Texas for Manny's salary plus $$ for A-rod plus more money for Magglio, we could be talking up to $10 million more this year (minus Williamson minus Lester).
How is this all good again?????? I forget
Juice
Dec 18 2003, 09:16 AM
[QUOTE]That'd be nothing new. He forgot his glove most of last year, too.
Manny's defense was better last year than any of his previous ones.
VerbalKint
Dec 18 2003, 09:16 AM
QUOTE(MikeyMitch @ Dec 18 2003, 08:32 AM)
"Right now, Matt, it is in the hands of the players association and the owners." A-Rod on The Today Show
Boras has convinced A-Rod not to work with the Sox on this one. Orza probably has as well. He's nothing more than a neutral third party.
I have to say I find this a very disappointing statement from Alex. I mean the guy actually paying his record salary has had to deal with his whining about playing for a bad team (brought on by said salary), lobbying to be traded to another team (and specifying which ones no less) and now with the resolution completed between all relevant parties he simply rolls over DOESN'T fight an organization that claims to work FOR the players?! Why have loyalty to these guys when he clearly had none to the guy actually paying him? Does this seem cowardly to anyone else? What could the MLBPA threaten him with that would cower him like this? No pension? A horsehead in his bed? What?
Leephus Pitch
Dec 18 2003, 09:22 AM
Here's how I see the situation, having observed(but not been a party to) many labor wranglings over the years:
All sides, even the Marxist Players' Union, want this deal done--especially now. For this to fall through at the 11th hour would leave mud on everyone's face(s). What has to happen now is for all sides to give a little, without them appearing to have done so. All parties need a graceful, non-humiliating, non-hatred eliciting way out of the mess.
Look for a deal to be announced, perhaps not today but at some point soon, whose details are not "readily available" for public discussion. In reality, I would expect the Sox to quietly cave on most matters, but the M.P.U. will also make what will be described as a "concession" but in reality won't be much at all. That way both(all)sides will say they got together for the good of the trade.
The only problem with this scenario is that the MPU is as rigid a union as there ever has been, and I'm not certain they give a damn about the good of anything except their own leadership's pricey Manhattan digs.
staz
Dec 18 2003, 09:23 AM
I have given these latest developments some deep thoughts (with Jack Handy) and have come up with the following hypothesis:
"It was clear it crossed the line ... and by a huge margin," Orza said after meeting with Rodriguez, his agent and Red Sox general manager Theo Epstein.
Ok. The operative phrase here is "Huge margin". Let's say Orza is exaggerating. For argument's sake let's say it's a "small margin".
Sox ownership strikes me as a pretty intelligent bunch. Before A-Rod's deal was rejected by MLBPA, I have to imagine Sox ownership realized that the restructuring they presented, even if it crossed the line by only a "small margin", would draw at least some fire from Orza. This leads me down 2 lines of reasoning:
1) Assume Sox ownership convinced A-Rod to a "wide margin" restructuring, EXPECTING it would get shot down. The expected rejection would focus pressure on MLBPA (as it has), opening the door for a 2nd (pre-arrainged?) restructuring - to a now softened-up MLBPA.
2) Same as (1) but only as a ploy to put pressure on Hicks to reduce his salary reimbursement demands.
A good trial lawyer never asks a question unless s/he already knows the answer. The degree to which Theo & Trio seem this morning to have their pants down around their ankles is in such stark contrast to everything they have come to represent to this point: creative, prepared, intelligent and determined. I have to assume that they were not caught completely off guard by this rejection and have a "Plan B-Rod" ready to go today.
Aside: Now that Selig has enterd the fray, it reminds me of the 1970s when Bowie Kuhn rejected the Oakland-Boston deal that would have sent us Joe Rudi and Rollie Fingers. There's actually a photo of Fingers, in Red Sox uniform, warming up in the Fenway bullpen a day before the deal was voided. Does anybody have a scan of that or know where it can be found on the net?
WallBallDouble
Dec 18 2003, 09:23 AM
What is the projected team OPS in 2004 w/ Manny/Nomar and a replacement 2Bman?
Explain to me how it lowers the OPS if you are taking away the 2003 versions of Nomar (.869) and Manny (1.014) and adding Arod (.996) and Ordonez (.926). Not to mention that Arod and Ordonez are likely to increase OPS in 2004 to be in line w/ recent years while Manny and Nomar will likely stay the same.
In my eyes, swapping these players are at the worst, an offensive wash.
Murrdogg4
Dec 18 2003, 09:27 AM
QUOTE(rrsafety @ Dec 18 2003, 08:48 AM)
THANK YOU MR. ORZA!!! for saving us from ourselves.
I just don't see the wisdom of the Red Sox trading:
Manny Ramirez
Nomar Garciapara
Scott Williamson
Jon Lester plus giving away
$3-5 million in cash a year for 5 years ($15 million - $25 million)
for
Alex Rodriquez
Magglio Ordonez
Especially when you consider that it won't even improve the team's OPS statistics (the most important of all offensive statistics).
A message for John, Larry, and Theo:
Just walk away. No real fan will be disappointed by your walking away from a bad deal.
That has been what I have been saying all along. It seems to me that with everything we are giving away, the ownership seems to believe that ARod can single-handedly not only win a world series this year with the Sox, but also win one every year for the next 6 or 7 yrs. Not gonna happen. Keep it how it is. I've been wearing my lucky Red Sox hat all day just hoping this "deadline" passes with no-one changing places.
bosson01
Dec 18 2003, 09:28 AM
About an hour ago ESPN radio had a guy reporting that the Sox wanted A-Rod to take a $30M cut over the life of the contract (compares roughly to the $5M/year the Rangers want the Sox to pay for Manny). In exchange A-Rod would get to be a free agent sooner. Union said that was not enough to offset the $30M. The source said Orza came back with a deal that involved a $13-14M pay cut over the term and the Sox rejected it.
I don't see the teams and MLB fighting the union on this issue. It would tie the thing up for weeks in arbitration. JWH will move on. I see this as mostly Hicks' fault for insisting on too much money along with Manny with 2nd place blame on Orza and the union. I suppose the Sox and Rangers might decide to split the difference ($30-$14=$16 difference, then $8M giveback from both sides) but given what I've read about Hicks I don't see that happening. His team is a shambles on the field and in the clubhouse and it looks like he's willing to keep it that way.
Edited - typos
VerbalKint
Dec 18 2003, 09:29 AM
QUOTE(rrsafety @ Dec 18 2003, 09:13 AM)
Below is a snapshot of the 2003 Red Sox starting nine. This team's average OPS based on the individual players career average OPS is .848
Damon, CF
Garciaparra, SS
Walker, 2B
Ramirez, LF
Ortiz, DH
Mueller, 3B
Varitek, C
Millar, 1B
Nixon, RF
Now, take a look at how a redesigned 2004 Red Sox would look assuming a pick up of A-Rod, Ordonez, and a middling second baseman with a career average OPS of .740. The OPS for the team actually DROPS to .834
Damon, CF
A-Rod, SS
Ordonez, RF
Anderson/Walker-type
Ortiz, DH
Mueller, 3B
Varitek, C
Millar, 1B
Nixon, LF
So, yes, picking up Foulke and Schilling is really important on the pitching side, but let's not fool ourselves into believing that these proposed trades improve our offense...they don't! And at what increased cost for 2004? With $$ going to Texas for Manny's salary plus $$ for A-rod plus more money for Magglio, we could be talking up to $10 million more this year (minus Williamson minus Lester).
How is this all good again?????? I forget
First of all you are making ALOT of assumptions over what the additional prospects and cash are in these deals. Since NO outlets have that information I'd be surprised to find out you do. The offense even configuered identical to last year was going to be lower. Just like you knew Lowe couldn't (likely) repeat his 2002 season, the chances of re-setting the MLB record in numerous categories just isn't likely to happen either. Effectively the option becomes:
Rent Nomar for one more year and watch him walk away since the chance of resigning him are likely pretty slim while being stuck with Planet Manny and his contract.
OR
Rent Mags for one year and be stuck with Alex and his contract.
I'd put the chances of us resigning Mags at better than Nomar and Williamson was gone the second we second we signed Foulke anyway (assuming he actually is a part of the White Sox deal) and and such was going to be a pawn in some deal, why not this one that nets us two premium players?
Making these deals couldn't be allowed to weaken the team too much immediately given how close we came last year AND all the impending FA after next year. They had to go for it now.
As it stands with the prososed Alex/Manny Nomar/Mags deals the Sox would have about 55-60 million in payroll becoming FA after next year. It's a lot of flexibility to work with that should allow them to stay competitive post 2004 while also putting a potentially great team on the field this year.
EDIT: spelling
iontheball
Dec 18 2003, 09:29 AM
I wouldn't blame the trio for walking away at this point but I agree it's most likely posturing - All sides are trying to get the upper hand (including ChiSox with this mornings deal dead on Ordonez leak) -
Austere
Dec 18 2003, 09:32 AM
QUOTE(rrsafety @ Dec 18 2003, 09:13 AM)
Below is a snapshot of the 2003 Red Sox starting nine. This team's average OPS based on the individual players career average OPS is .848
Damon, CF
Garciaparra, SS
Walker, 2B
Ramirez, LF
Ortiz, DH
Mueller, 3B
Varitek, C
Millar, 1B
Nixon, RF
Now, take a look at how a redesigned 2004 Red Sox would look assuming a pick up of A-Rod, Ordonez, and a middling second baseman with a career average OPS of .740. The OPS for the team actually DROPS to .834
Damon, CF
A-Rod, SS
Ordonez, RF
Anderson/Walker-type
Ortiz, DH
Mueller, 3B
Varitek, C
Millar, 1B
Nixon, LF
So, yes, picking up Foulke and Schilling is really important on the pitching side, but let's not fool ourselves into believing that these proposed trades improve our offense...they don't! And at what increased cost for 2004? With $$ going to Texas for Manny's salary plus $$ for A-rod plus more money for Magglio, we could be talking up to $10 million more this year (minus Williamson minus Lester).
How is this all good again?????? I forget
Key problem here is that you can't just blindly take career OPS, as Nomar hasn't been the 99-2000 Nomar since 99-2000.
crazy carls agent
Dec 18 2003, 09:33 AM
QUOTE(rrsafety @ Dec 18 2003, 08:48 AM)
THANK YOU MR. ORZA!!! for saving us from ourselves.
I just don't see the wisdom of the Red Sox trading:
Manny Ramirez
Nomar Garciapara
Scott Williamson
Jon Lester plus giving away
$3-5 million in cash a year for 5 years ($15 million - $25 million)
for
Alex Rodriquez
Magglio Ordonez
Especially when you consider that it won't even improve the team's OPS statistics (the most important of all offensive statistics).
A message for John, Larry, and Theo:
Just walk away. No real fan will be disappointed by your walking away from a bad deal.
http://forums.redsoxnation.net/index.php?showtopic=439&st=25quote donmehan
BUT, in the last 3 seasons the combined OPS:
combined ops last 3 years for Manny and Nomar:
1.898
combined ops last 3 years for Ordonez and ARod
1.951
ALSO, ARod is 2 years younger than Nomar.
And, Ordonez is 2 years younger than Manny.
----------------------------------
That looks like an improvement to me.
vafenway
Dec 18 2003, 09:33 AM
All day? Since midnight?
rrsafety
Dec 18 2003, 09:35 AM
QUOTE(WallBallDouble @ Dec 18 2003, 09:20 AM)
Explain to me how it lowers the OPS if you are taking away the 2003 versions of Nomar (.869) and Manny (1.014) and adding Arod (.996) and Ordonez (.926). Not to mention that Arod and Ordonez are likely to increase OPS in 2004 to be in line w/ recent years while Manny and Nomar will likely stay the same.
You can't just willy-nilly choose your stats....
Fans always get into trouble with stats when they say things like the guys we are getting will get better and the guys we are trading away are likely to get worse. Why do you say that? What is your evidence? What proof do you have?
The best predictor of future performance is past performance. To assess what is "most likely to happen in the future" it is only correct to understand what "definately" happened in the past...and that is career performance.
Yes, players will sometimes play above or below their average career performance, but they also are likely to revert to that average over time.
Wishful thinking that the new guys on the team will get better while the old guys traded away will get worse is just that...wishful thinking and that is no way to run a baseball team.
NJSoxFan
Dec 18 2003, 09:37 AM
I can not believe this deal is most likely not happening now. This really sucks - you do not often have the chance to get 2 players like Magglio and AROD.
I know Nomar will not tank it next year and all that - but at this point I just can not see this being a great clubhouse in '04 knowing that ownership wanted Nomar and Manny out. Same goes for Texas w/ AROD.
Damn union.
MCO Sox Fan
Dec 18 2003, 09:37 AM
I know deadlines are made to be broken, but can we get this deal done one way or the other today? The suspense is killing me. No matter which way the chips fall, we are entering '04 with a monster lineup and staff poised to slay the Evil Empire.
The trade has taken on a life of its own and has grown to critical mass. CNN has the trade status scroll by on its ticker every once in a while. Its the lead story on almost every sports related web site. It wouldn't surprise me if the WX channel is already forecasting the conditions for A-Rod's first game in Fenway.
All I know is that my desire for an outcome has me trolling the web boards and sports outlets like never before. It feels like October and the lack of sleep I got watching the games. Please, let this happen today!
Leave it to the White Sox to throw another wrench into the machine. Bad enough the union wants some pub, now the other Sox need some. Take Nomar and Williamson and be happy you got the upper hand in the deal. They should be careful, or Theo and Co. will pull the rug out like they did with the Dodgers. Quite a few teams looking for an All Star SS and a closer that will likely be willing to give up more than the other Sox are.
chowder35
Dec 18 2003, 09:37 AM
but part of your OPS argument is based on nomar before he broke his wrist. We know he isn't the same and is possible he won't get better.
SoxinDC
Dec 18 2003, 09:39 AM
At some point, some of you Anti-Arods have to recognize that he's the best player in baseball and that he will have a very positive impact on the club. Imagine, in 3 years he will be going for HR number 500 in Fenway park, not to mention that he will be batting in an already potent lineup where his numbers are sure to be fantastic. This guy put up MVP numbers with minimal protection in the lineup...imagine what he could do with a guy like Magglio or even Ortiz behind him. I think it's fair to say that we're giving up a lot, but this will be the biggest acquisition in Red Sox history.
chowder35
Dec 18 2003, 09:39 AM
the biggest problem now, is after next year when nomar takes off, who plays shortstop?
vafenway
Dec 18 2003, 09:40 AM
DC is right on the money - wake up Sox fans - and Gene Orza
Austere
Dec 18 2003, 09:40 AM
QUOTE(rrsafety @ Dec 18 2003, 09:32 AM)
QUOTE(WallBallDouble @ Dec 18 2003, 09:20 AM)
Explain to me how it lowers the OPS if you are taking away the 2003 versions of Nomar (.869) and Manny (1.014) and adding Arod (.996) and Ordonez (.926). Not to mention that Arod and Ordonez are likely to increase OPS in 2004 to be in line w/ recent years while Manny and Nomar will likely stay the same.
You can't just willy-nilly choose your stats....
Fans always get into trouble with stats when they say things like the guys we are getting will get better and the guys we are trading away are likely to get worse. Why do you say that? What is your evidence? What proof do you have?
The best predictor of future performance is past performance. To assess what is "most likely to happen in the future" it is only correct to understand what "definately" happened in the past...and that is career performance.
Yes, players will sometimes play above or below their average career performance, but they also are likely to revert to that average over time.
Wishful thinking that the new guys on the team will get better while the old guys traded away will get worse is just that...wishful thinking and that is no way to run a baseball team.
Unfortunately not all players are Barry Bonds. They're not all like wine, they don't get better with age, (on average) hitting is much different than pitching in the sense that an older pitcher's wisdom helps him compete with the talent of young fireballers with pitch selection, speed variance, and a variety of other things. In this case I would have to say that an offensive guy 2 years younger, who's had his numbers climbing steadily has a higher probability of outperforming himself than a guy 2 years older who's been steadily _declining_ for the past 2-3 seasons based on a nagging injury.
ThePlayer
Dec 18 2003, 09:41 AM
QUOTE(bosson01 @ Dec 18 2003, 09:25 AM)
About an hour ago ESPN radio had a guy reporting that the Sox wanted A-Rod to take a $30M cut over the life of the contract (compares roughly to the $5M/year the Rangers want the Sox to pay for Manny). In exchange A-Rod would get to be a free agent sooner. Union said that was not enough to offset the $30M. The source said Orza came back with a deal that involved a $13-14M pay cut over the term and the Sox rejected it.
I don't see the teams and MLB fighting the union on this issue. It would tie the thing up for weeks in arbitration. JWH will move on. I see this as mostly Hicks' fault for insisting on too much money along with Manny with 2nd place blame on Orza and the union. I suppose the Sox and Rangers might decide to split the difference ($30-$14=$16 difference, then $8M giveback from both sides) but given what I've read about Hicks I don't see that happening. His team is a shambles on the field and in the clubhouse and it looks like he's willing to keep it that way.
Edited - typos
Ok, this makes no sense. if the union has the stance that a contract can't be devalued, and the Sox are trying to shave $30m of the contract, how can the union come back and say....you can't shave $30m, but we will let you shave $15m?
I guess the good news is that the union is willing to negoutiate.....but if their stance is that a contract can't be devalued, they are being hypocritical.
staz
Dec 18 2003, 09:42 AM
And another thing. Nomar is on the decline. Decline, people! Compare his stas before the injury and after the injury. Look at his defense. Look at his stats last year in September and October (a.k.a. crunch time). Drew Bledsoe wasn't a popular trade either, but what has he done in Buffalo? D E C L I N E
Flame away.
crazy carls agent
Dec 18 2003, 09:43 AM
QUOTE(rrsafety @ Dec 18 2003, 09:32 AM)
Wishful thinking that the new guys on the team will get better while the old guys traded away will get worse is just that...wishful thinking and that is no way to run a baseball team.
I think the age factor in the deal is an attractive thing to the Sox. Two years doesn't seem like a lot to everyday people. But it is a significant part of any professional sports career.
Manny and Nomar are still great players, but they are at that age where the production
could drop off very quickly. After all, not every player has the type of longevity that Barry Bonds has.
Arod and Maggs are entering the prime of their careers. They are a safer bet to put up the kind of numbers that you would expect.
Thats not guaranteed, but you have to go with the percentages.
VerbalKint
Dec 18 2003, 09:44 AM
QUOTE(SoxinDC @ Dec 18 2003, 09:36 AM)
At some point, some of you Anti-Arods have to recognize that he's the best player in baseball and that he will have a very positive impact on the club. Imagine, in 3 years he will be going for HR number 500 in Fenway park, not to mention that he will be batting in an already potent lineup where his numbers are sure to be fantastic. This guy put up MVP numbers with minimal protection in the lineup...imagine what he could do with a guy like Magglio or even Ortiz behind him. I think it's fair to say that we're giving up a lot, but this will be the biggest acquisition in Red Sox history.
Some rose colored-glasses here too. To proclaim the Texas lineup as minimally protective is like saying the Sox offense was OK last year. The Rangers had very good offenses the last few years, he's been quite protected in that lineup. You could argue that Palmiero is better protection than Ortiz given Ortiz has done it once and Raf has done it 10 years running.
WallBallDouble
Dec 18 2003, 09:44 AM
I am going by past performance. Tell me what trends you see here:
Nomar OPS
1996 .743
1997 .876
1998 .946
1999 1.021
2000 1.033
2001 .822
2002 .880
2003 .869
What happened in the fall of 2000? INJURY TO WRIST. Nomar is not the same player he was in 1999-2000. Past performance does not say he will return to that level of production.
Arod OPS
1994 .445
1995 .672
1996 1.045
1997 .846
1998 .920
1999 .943
2000 1.026
2001 1.021
2002 1.015
2003 .996
Do you think Arod will continue to decline, or do you think 2003 was just a bit of a down year? I dont think i'm going out on a limb to say he will rebound to 2000-2002 levels.
Manny is Manny, he is pretty much the same, at least in the next few years. The guy is just going to hit.
Ordonez
1997 .918
1998 .741
1999 .859
2000 .917
2001 .915
2002 .978
2003 .926
OK, was 2003 a bit of a down year? Maybe. Was 2002 a career year? Maybe. But it is likely that he will find a median between the two, especially going from Cingular Field to Fenway.
You just can take career OPS, as another poster brought up. You have to look at recent OPS and trends.
VAsoxfan
Dec 18 2003, 09:45 AM
QUOTE(iontheball @ Dec 18 2003, 09:26 AM)
I wouldn't blame the trio for walking away at this point but I agree it's most likely posturing - All sides are trying to get the upper hand (including ChiSox with this mornings deal dead on Ordonez leak) -
They SHOULD walk away. They have not gone over the cliff on this and the team will be the favorite for the pennant regardless of the outcome of these negotiations.
Manny's contract, and ARod's contract, will still be around and waiting for this trade to happen later this month, next month, or during the spring. I know Nomar will probably walk after 2004. But you know what, ARod walked from the Mariners a few years ago, and I seem to recall them weathering that pretty well.
Too much time is being wasted playing games with Hicks and Orza. And I don't want help from Bud Selig. He has proven to be, time and again, an idiot.
vafenway
Dec 18 2003, 09:49 AM
If anyone gets an update from Gasbag or Kjerkian please update the rest of us.
MCO Sox Fan
Dec 18 2003, 09:49 AM
QUOTE
Too much time is being wasted playing games with Hicks and Orza. And I don't want help from Bud Selig. He has proven to be, time and again, an idiot.
Amen brother!
vafenway
Dec 18 2003, 09:50 AM
If not for Uncle Bud we wouldn't have the ownership we have now
VerbalKint
Dec 18 2003, 09:52 AM
QUOTE(VAsoxfan @ Dec 18 2003, 09:42 AM)
Too much time is being wasted playing games with Hicks and Orza. And I don't want help from Bud Selig. He has proven to be, time and again, an idiot.
I have to agree that when Boras and Selig are some of your biggest allies it makes alarm bells sound off in my head very loudly. Selig has proven on numerous occasssions that when he tries to 'help' things only get worse. (All-star game, new stadium in Mil, pretty much his enitre tenure as commissioner/Brewers owner/Expos controller)
All that being said with options of 1) mess of making deal happen vs. 2) mess of no deal happening
I think #2 is worse.
Murrdogg4
Dec 18 2003, 09:56 AM
QUOTE(staz @ Dec 18 2003, 09:39 AM)
And another thing. Nomar is on the decline. Decline, people! Compare his stas before the injury and after the injury. Look at his defense. Look at his stats last year in September and October (a.k.a. crunch time). Drew Bledsoe wasn't a popular trade either, but what has he done in Buffalo? D E C L I N E
Flame away.
Drew Bledsoe also got hurt at the beginning of the season, and Tom Brady came in and won a super bowl for us. I don't think you can compare the two at all. Plus we all knew that Drew would go at the end of the season. We couldn't keep them both, and look what we have there now.
iontheball
Dec 18 2003, 09:58 AM
QUOTE(MCO Sox Fan @ Dec 18 2003, 09:46 AM)
QUOTE
Too much time is being wasted playing games with Hicks and Orza. And I don't want help from Bud Selig. He has proven to be, time and again, an idiot.
Amen brother!
I still like the idea of the trade understanding that we don't have all the particulars yet - BUT!!!!! You have to be ready to walk at any time if you want to get the best deal possible - To the point where you understand there may be no deal at all - I think the trio will walk if pushed hard enough - The alternative (stay pat) is not that bad -
MCO Sox Fan
Dec 18 2003, 10:00 AM
QUOTE
All that being said with options of 1) mess of making deal happen vs. 2) mess of no deal happening
I think #2 is worse.
I would agree, but if the deal dies we would get the opportunity to see Theo under fire again. If he could re-sign Nomar after all that has gone on, it would make the Schilling deal look like a walk in the park.
Caspir
Dec 18 2003, 10:03 AM
In case anybody wants to call the union and "voice your support" the # is ########### Just in case your interested.
We are not going to publish phone numbers on this board. Anni
WallBallDouble
Dec 18 2003, 10:04 AM
While I believe that considering all the current conditions, Arod/Magglio for Nomar/Manny is the best move, I also do not believe you make this trade AT ALL COSTS. If the specifics of the deal puts the Sox in a worse position (paying Texas $5M per year, givin up too many prospects) then I think the Sox should back away, and resume negotiating an extention w/ Nomar. They have to agree on a deal that benefits them, not give in to a deal just because "we've come this far".
redsoxmania13
Dec 18 2003, 10:04 AM
A-Rod TalksQUOTE
A-Rod: I'll only go Boston with union approval
By Ronald Blum, Associated Press, 12/18/2003
NEW YORK -- Alex Rodriguez is willing to go to the Red Sox only if Boston restructures his contract in a manner that gains approval from the players' association.
Boston and Texas said Wednesday they settled on all the players involved in the trade. And the Red Sox and A-Rod agreed to restructure the shortstop's record $252 million contract, Rangers owner Tom Hicks said.
But in a rare move, the union intervened and rejected the agreement, drawing criticism from both teams.
Commissioner Bud Selig set a 5 p.m. Thursday deadline for the trade to be completed. He might also go against the union and approve the restructuring, likely forcing the matter to arbitration.
"In the spirit of cooperation, I advised the Red Sox I am willing to restructure my contract, but only within the guidelines prescribed by union officials," Rodriguez said Thursday in a statement he read to The Associated Press. "I recognize the principle involved, and fully support the need to protect the interests of my fellow players.
"If my transfer to the Red Sox is to occur, it must be done with consideration of the interests of all major league players, not just one. Any statements by club officials suggesting my position is different than stated is inaccurate and unfortunate."
His agent said it was up to the Red Sox to find a way to restructure his client's contract without reducing its value, which would allow the proposed blockbuster trade for Manny Ramirez to take place.
"It's in the teams' hands," agent Scott Boras said Thursday. "Unless Boston comes back with a proposal that meets the union's criteria, then the deal will not get done."
Because union official Gene Orza and management lawyer Rob Manfred traveled to Florida for Bubba Trammell's grievance hearing Thursday, the deadline may have to be extended.
If the deal does go through, Boston would likely trade longtime shortstop Nomar Garciaparra, possibly to the Chicago White Sox.
"Given the impending deadline imposed by the office of the commissioner, the actions of the players' association may, unfortunately, determine this issue," Hicks said.
The commissioner's office said it was studying the agreement between Rodriguez and the Red Sox, but Orza said it was unacceptable.
"It was clear it crossed the line ... and by a huge margin," Orza said after meeting with Rodriguez, his agent and Red Sox general manager Theo Epstein. "We did suggest an offer the club could make to Alex that would not do that. As was its right, the club chose not to make it."
Manfred challenged the union's interpretation.
"The basic agreement contains a rule that requires any special covenant to be an actual or potential benefit to the player," Manfred said. "In a situation like the current situation, where there was a restructuring, where the player was getting something and the club was getting something, Gene Orza is not the final arbitrator on whether the restructuring provides an actual or potential benefit to the player. The commissioner currently is considering his legal options in consultation with the two teams."
After reaching Florida, Orza responded: "Fortunately, perjury charges attend false testimony in arbitrations, and I know what Rob thinks about what he now characterizes as this attempted 'restructuring' of Alex's contract. So I'm not particularly worried about what he's saying in the press."
While no one detailed the agreement between Rodriguez and the Red Sox, Boston president Larry Lucchino said the union proposed "radical changes."
The agreement called for some salary to be reduced and some to be deferred in exchange for giving Rodriguez the right to become a free agent earlier in the deal, a high-ranking baseball official said on the condition of anonymity.
Currently, Rodriguez can end the contract after the 2007 season. He also can end it after 2008 or 2009 unless he gets an annual increase from $27 million to either $32 million or $1 million above the largest salary of any position player.
"It is a sad day when the players' association thwarts the will of its members," Lucchino said. "The players' association asserts that it supports individual negotiations, freedom of choice and player mobility. However, in this high-profile instance, their action contradicts this and is contrary to the desires of the player."
That's not the way Orza saw it.
"All of the players and agents who have dealt with Larry these many years will be gratified to know that he still has the players' interests, as opposed to the clubs', uppermost in his mind and deepest in his heart," he said.
If Selig approves the restructuring and the union files a grievance, the case would go to Shyam Das, baseball's arbitrator.
Rodriguez hit .298 with an AL-leading 47 home runs and 118 RBIs last season. Ramirez, an outfielder, hit .325 with 37 homers and 104 RBIs.
Yankees owner George Steinbrenner didn't think the trade would go through.
"But if I had Nomar," he added, "I wouldn't trade him because of how much he means to that team and that city."
AP Sports Writers Jimmy Golen in Boston, Stephen Hawkins in Dallas and Ben Walker in New York contributed to this report
© Copyright 2003 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
© Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company
NJSoxFan
Dec 18 2003, 10:10 AM
great
sox65
Dec 18 2003, 10:10 AM
I have to belive the deal is dead. It wasn't until I read this on the New York Times web site.
"Both the Red Sox and the Rangers were critical of the union's stance on Wednesday, but this morning Rodriguez said in a statement that the trade would have to fall within players association guidelines and that the union was not standing in his way or thwarting his wishes.
"In the spirit of cooperation, I advised the Red Sox I am willing to restructure my contract, but only within the guidelines prescribed by union officials," Rodriguez said in a statement he read to The Associated Press. "I recognize the principle involved, and fully support the need to protect the interests of my fellow players.
"If my transfer to the Red Sox is to occur, it must be done with consideration of the interests of all major league players, not just one. Any statements by club officials suggesting my position is different than stated is inaccurate and unfortunate."
As I understand this, A-Rod is saying, he will not waive his no-trade clause unless the players association is happy with the deal. So even if Selig approves it and an arbiter rules against the player's association, the deal is still dead, beacuse A-rod won't go against the union.
So for the deal to go throught the Red Sox will be extorted for even more money, which I doubt they will pay. I think both Luccino's and Henry's comments show we did all we could, and this a heck of a way for the deal to die, but let's get on with the great team we have assembled sense to them.
Just my impression. I hope I'm wrong.
NJSoxFan
Dec 18 2003, 10:11 AM
QUOTE
In case anybody wants to call the union and "voice your support" the # is xxxxxxxxxxxxx. Just in case your interested.
Yeah I just spoke with Rebecca, she said no deal has been made as of yet, but she feels that it will get done today.
MainerSoxFan
Dec 18 2003, 10:12 AM
QUOTE(NJSoxFan @ Dec 18 2003, 10:08 AM)
QUOTE
In case anybody wants to call the union and "voice your support" the # is xxxxxxxxxxxx. Just in case your interested.
Yeah I just spoke with Rebecca, she said no deal has been made as of yet, but she feels that it will get done today.
Who is Rebecca?
vafenway
Dec 18 2003, 10:13 AM
Is she open to a date as well?
MCO Sox Fan
Dec 18 2003, 10:14 AM
QUOTE
Yankees owner George Steinbrenner didn't think the trade would go through.
"But if I had Nomar," he added, "I wouldn't trade him because of how much he means to that team and that city."
What George really meant:
"I can't stand the thought of the best player in baseball winding up in Boston, so I will try and put a spin on things that makes Boston management look as Evil as I am."
Caspir
Dec 18 2003, 10:14 AM
QUOTE(NJSoxFan @ Dec 18 2003, 10:08 AM)
QUOTE
In case anybody wants to call the union and "voice your support" the # is xxxxxxxxxxxx Just in case your interested.
Yeah I just spoke with Rebecca, she said no deal has been made as of yet, but she feels that it will get done today.
HaHa you really called? And they told you they thought it would get done today? Damn not bad. Kudos.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.