QUOTE(kiransdad @ Jun 9 2005, 03:44 PM)
Bonds is an asterisk.
Mays is #4 in my book right now behind Ruth, Teddy, and #44.
Mantle would have been the best undoubtedly were it not for lifelong bone problems and a wicked drinking habit.
Griffey can barely get through a season and is now unfortunately a woulda coulda.
DiMaggio was a phenomenal all around player but maybe makes top #5 if you throw out The Human Asterisk.
I'm pulling for Albie and Miggie....
[right][snapback]330987[/snapback][/right]
Here's why A-Rod (who, you should not fail to note, is a 3d baseman and not a SS) is not 2nd best.
First, A-Rod's last full season was his age 28 season so let's take the stats of the players I listed through age 28:
A-Rod - he's the baseline - .305/.381/.574 - 381HR 205 SB and 5590 ABs. 1HR/14.7 ABs.
Note that I have included SBs because, I am assuming, you included SBs in your statement that he's the 2nd best all around pure ballplayer.
Willie Mays thru age 28 - .317/.392/.590 250 HR 179 SB in 4074 ABs. 1HR/16.3 ABs.
Mickey Mantle thru age 28 - .307/.422/.567 320 HR 112 SB in 5005 ABs - note that Mantle was in the top 10 in SBs in every year except one from 1953-1960 and twice he was in the top 10 with single numbers in SBs. Teams did not run as much then. 1HR/15.6 ABs.
Ken Griffey thru age 28 - .300/.378/.567 - 350 HR 143 SB and 5226 ABs. 1HR/14.9 ABs
Joe DiMaggio thru age 27 (He was in WWII during his age 28 season) - .339/.400/.607 - He had 219 HRs and a negligible amount of SBs and 3978 ABs. 1HR/18.1 ABs. I am guessing his HRs were reduced a bit by playing in a certain cavern built by Babe Ruth.
When you compare Rodriguez to those four guys, he's right in the middle of the pack. He has the best HR/AB ratio among those guys, but he has a few negatives as well. He now plays a relatively inconsequential position (relatively poorly, I might add). His OBP is only above Griffey's. His SLG is above Griffey and Mantle's, but is still lower than Mays and DiMaggio. The bottom line is this, there is no quesion that Alex Rodriguez deserves consideration among the greats to play the game, but it's far far far too early to say that he's second only to Babe Ruth. Ken Griffey, in particular, says hi to that one. My inclusion of Griffey in this analysis was to illustrate how different things can look only 3-4 years removed from a tremendous season. Griffey's status among the greats of the game is so different now from what it was even 3 years ago.
p.s. I got sick of using the calculator when it came time to Bonds whose first great year wasn't until he was 25.