Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: 'Belli is back
Royal Rooters > WE'RE TALKIN' BASEBALL > RED SOX - ON THE FIELD
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Curll
It was just on Cold Pizza. Looking for a link. Sorry if this isn't thread-worthy.

Edit: Links are hard to come by, it seems. Though, it is "breaking news".
teddykgb
Of course this would be thread worthy
Preacher
I just saw this on Cold Pizza too. Looking for a link as well. This is great news if true.
teddykgb
Depends on who we gave up, of course. But given Bard's struggles and the relative ages of Wakefield and Mirabelli, it may just make sense to let the two of them ride off into the sunset together.
alskor
Caught it as well! Buster Olney wouldnt report it if not true... He only speculates about the Yanks... Have to remember next time that Olney has a contact in the padres org...

I am so stoked! I have tickets fifth rows behind the yankees bullpen tonight!

I cannot wait to see the reaction for Mirabelli!

Awesome!
MAD SoxFan
I had a feeling this would happen. It is great news if they did.
It would be hilarious if they traded Belli for Seanez.
Red Sox Fan2
Idk, I liked Bard. He wasn't THAT bad.. Belli was bad in his first year too and Bard O hasn't been costing us much. Plus he's young, cheap, defensive catcher who can take pitches. Easy to lock in and fill the back up catching spot for a long time.
Curll
Trade rumor: Seanez for Belli
Doc
QUOTE(MAD SoxFan @ May 1 2006, 11:30 AM) [snapback]509907[/snapback]

I had a feeling this would happen. It is great news if they did.
It would be hilarious if they traded Belli for Seanez.

I joked about it in the Bard thread but at SOSH they are saying Seanez or Seanez and Bard for Mirabelli.
Preacher
QUOTE(MAD SoxFan @ May 1 2006, 10:30 AM) [snapback]509907[/snapback]

I had a feeling this would happen. It is great news if they did.
It would be hilarious if they traded Belli for Seanez.


How about Seanez and Bard for Mirabelli?

Edit: Doc beat me to it
Cambridge
Dale Arnold just opined on WEEI that, "Rudy Seanez would be too much to give up for Doug Mirabelli." huh.gif

Yes, I laughed aloud.
alskor
QUOTE(Doc @ May 1 2006, 11:32 AM) [snapback]509910[/snapback]

I joked about it in the Bard thread but at SOSH they are saying Seanez or Seanez and Bard for Mirabelli.

...Seanez and Bard for Mirabelli might be a bit much... oh well
Caspir
Seanez and Bard for Belli would solve two problems. No more passed balls every three pitches, and no more Seanez. Wow. So basically we (may have) traded Seanez and Bard for Loretta, and we kept Belli.
unholycow
this is ridiculous. Bard will get the hang of it in time for the playoffs. Sheesh
alskor
QUOTE(Cambridge @ May 1 2006, 11:33 AM) [snapback]509913[/snapback]

Dale Arnold just opined on WEEI that, "Rudy Seanez would be too much to give up for Doug Mirabelli." huh.gif

Yes, I laughed aloud.

Immediately before they were talking about how Seanez has to go... Maybe Bruins management has rubbed off on poor Dale...
Curll
Suppose we trade Bard and Seanez, who takes Seanez' spot in the pen? Riske?
MAD SoxFan
If it IS a Seanez Mirabelli swap, what would they do with Bard?
blumj
QUOTE(Red Sox Fan2 @ May 1 2006, 10:31 AM) [snapback]509908[/snapback]

Idk, I liked Bard. He wasn't THAT bad.. Belli was bad in his first year too and Bard O hasn't been costing us much. Plus he's young, cheap, defensive catcher who can take pitches. Easy to lock in and fill the back up catching spot for a long time.

I like Bard, too, just not to catch Wake, at least not right now. I do hope we get to keep him, though.
MAD SoxFan
QUOTE(Curll @ May 1 2006, 11:37 AM) [snapback]509918[/snapback]

Suppose we trade Bard and Seanez, who takes Seanez' spot in the pen? Riske?


Perhaps Hansen?

That would be sweet.
Fiskian Pole Shot
QUOTE(Curll @ May 1 2006, 10:37 AM) [snapback]509918[/snapback]

Suppose we trade Bard and Seanez, who takes Seanez' spot in the pen? Riske?



Choose one:

Ginter
Hansen
Van Buren
Bausher

My prediction? Van Buren
teddykgb
Bard's a pretty OK player, but he is what he is and he's just about average for a catcher. You don't bend over backwards to keep average players.

I'm disappointed that so many people are that down on Seanez. Arnold is right that Seanez is too much to give up for a backup catcher, except in this case the peace of mind may just be worth it.

I think the real lesson here is just how disparate the AL and NL are righ tnow. Pedro's throwing 86 and making a run at the Cy, all these NL pitchers keep coming to the AL and getting shelled, and Bronson goes to the NL Central and is suddenly dominant.
alskor
QUOTE(blumj @ May 1 2006, 11:38 AM) [snapback]509921[/snapback]

I like Bard, too, just not to catch Wake, at least not right now. I do hope we get to keep him, though.

I wonder if there is any possibility of him playing other positions(almost certainly not though). Id really hate to lose him as we would be losing all of our depth at catcher and Tek is already hurting...(please dont throw Ken Huckaby and Corky Miller in my face... rolleyes.gif )
Fiskian Pole Shot
Considering that we are now within a month of the next draft, might there be a PTBNL included, which would turn into a 2005 draftee?
mwpeters8182
Don't you have to wait a year to trade someone who's been drafted?
Fiskian Pole Shot
QUOTE(mwpeters8182 @ May 1 2006, 10:43 AM) [snapback]509927[/snapback]

Don't you have to wait a year to trade someone who's been drafted?


Yes, but a PTBNL can be named within a certain amount of time (can't remember whether it is 30 or 60 days), which puts the 2005 draftees in play.
ManRamEm
QUOTE(alskor @ May 1 2006, 11:33 AM) [snapback]509914[/snapback]

...Seanez and Bard for Mirabelli might be a bit much... oh well


I'll be able to sleep better at night. Don't really know how it would be too much. Belli has a lot more pop in his bat coming off the bench as well.

Well done, IMO.
kylexray
QUOTE(MAD SoxFan @ May 1 2006, 10:38 AM) [snapback]509922[/snapback]

Perhaps Hansen?

That would be sweet.


This is exaclty what I thouhgt. Paging Craig Hansen. Craig Hansen to Yawkey Way please.
Preacher
Sure, Mirabelli may just be a back up catcher, but don't forget about his locker room presence and all those juicy intangibles.
Fiskian Pole Shot
Bard, Meredith, and cash!

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2428645

An absolute steal, imho.
WeWantNumber7
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2428645
[icon]
The Boston Red Sox have finalized a trade to obtain catcher Doug Mirabelli from the San Diego Padres in exchange for catcher Josh Bard, minor-league pitcher Clay Meredith and cash, ESPN The Magazine's Buster Olney is reporting.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2428645

We gave up Bard and CLA?!

sad.gif
Harry Bobbin Manass
QUOTE(kylexray @ May 1 2006, 11:44 AM) [snapback]509932[/snapback]

This is exaclty what I thouhgt. Paging Craig Hansen. Craig Hansen to Yawkey Way please.

Possible, but I doubt it. He's had one appearance at AAA. They've committed to taking their time with him. One possibility that hasn't been mentioned is Mike Holtz. That would get Tito a lefty in the pen. Holtz has pitched well so far for the PawSox (2.61 ERA, 0.87 WHIP, 14 Ks in 10.1 IP).
Edmund Dantes
Already being discussed.
Fiskian Pole Shot
From the ESPN article...

QUOTE
The Yankees also tried to obtain Mirabelli to keep him from returning to the Red Sox.


http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2428645
Curll
Eeeh. Not too crazy about that, Cla was doing well in Pawtucket. And we still have Seanez.

Edit: AND a PTBNL? Yikes
buffaloredsoxfan
Bard, Clay Meredith and Cash

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2428645
Seabass
Not a huge fan of Cla being involved in the trade.
BostonSox37
Damn. ****ing Seanez is still here? He needs to go away. Anyways, since it's about lunchtime:

IPB Image

I said, with quite certainty, that Belli would not be back for tonight's game. I was wrong.
mascho
QUOTE(Fiskian Pole Shot @ May 1 2006, 11:50 AM) [snapback]509945[/snapback]

From the ESPN article...
The Yankees also tried to obtain Mirabelli to keep him from returning to the Red Sox.

Thereby driving up the price, forcing the Sox to add Meredith to this deal.

If I'm being honest, the winners in this deal are the Yankees.
Red Sox Fan2
Bard AND Clay...? This deal should have been over at Clay. Are we getting anything else back besides Belli?
Harry Bobbin Manass
QUOTE(Fiskian Pole Shot @ May 1 2006, 11:47 AM) [snapback]509937[/snapback]

Bard, Meredith, and cash!

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2428645

An absolute steal, imho.

A steal? Eh, it's alright.

Bard is younger, cheaper, doesn't have a sore back and is probably better overall than Mirabelli right now. The only thing Mirabelli has over him is that he can catch the knuckleball. That's important to Boston, but San Diego made out pretty well to get Meredith and cash thrown in.

Mirabelli is hitting .182/.308/.227 this year after being pretty bad offensively last year (.228/.309//412). Welcome back, though!
unholycow
This is awful. We traded a young catcher who was learning to catch a knuckeball and could hit a little for a 36 year old with a bad back who's hitting .182. What happened to thinking "long term"? Why has everyone forgotten how to spell Cla Meredith?
buffaloredsoxfan

I said, with quite certainty, that Belli would not be back for tonight's game. I was wrong.
[/quote]



No harm no foul.....I think Cla Meredith may have been a little steep. sad.gif
D-Lowe
Well, glad Belli is back, if only because it stabilizes our rotation with Wakes now (hopefully). However, giving up Meredith with Bard was a little too steep. Long-term, we now don't have a future young catcher on the horizon as Varitek will not be able to be the starter by the last year of his contract (gave away Shoppach and now Bard), which concerns me in 2008.
Fiskian Pole Shot
I didn't see much hope for Meredith as a huge part of the Sox' future roster, so I don't think this is much of a loss. I think that Cla is the exact type of MiL pitcher that a team should use as trade bait.

Only one man's opinion, though.
Ellis Greenwell
Hypothetically speaking, if back in January or so the Sox had made a trade of Bard and Meredith for Seanez and Loretta, most everyone here would be thrilled. That is basically the end-result but I think the fact that it's May 1st and there's been little instant gratification to speak of regarding Seanez or Loretta, people are not happy. I think this is a fair deal if you look at the big picture.
BentleySoxFan
Did anyone really think Meredith was ever going to be a solid major league reliever? I sure didn't.

We gave up Bard, Cla, a few bucks, and probably a A-ball prospect for Dougie. As posted over on SoSH, 14 of Wake's 19 runs allowed have been earned (73%), whereas the AL average is 91% earned. That's why we got him. Also, can't hurt to bring in a guy who can hit LHP a little.
VoteRiceIn
Doesn't this seem like a panic move? Just seems to me kind of early to be pushing the panic button.....just doesn't seem Theo-ish.

Next week: Willy Mo, Wells & Hansen to Cinci for Bronson?
Velvet Elvis
With 'Belli gone, Wake's value plummeted. It's an expensive insurance policy, but for Wake to be effective he needs Mirabelli. Wake can pitch 300 innings, but if someone isn't catching (or blocking) the ball, it's all for naught.

Giving up Cla was a bit steep, but ultimately necessary. The Loretta trade was good because it upgraded our defense up the middle. Unfortunately, having bard catching Wake negated that.

At the start of todays game, our team defense will be better.
Locklandworth
QUOTE(BostonSox37 @ May 1 2006, 11:52 AM) [snapback]509949[/snapback]

Damn. ****ing Seanez is still here? He needs to go away. Anyways, since it's about lunchtime:

SNIP PIC

I said, with quite certainty, that Belli would not be back for tonight's game. I was wrong.




We can't always be right.

Welcome back Belli, you're not the cure for everything, but at least we know the FO is being pro-active this year and I like that.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.