Lou Duffys Cliff
Dec 25 2006, 04:22 PM
Just say no Josh
Official: D-Backs, Yanks talking Unit tradeQUOTE
In the past week the Arizona Diamondbacks have offered a package of players to the New York Yankees in exchange for Randy Johnson, a baseball official said.
In need of starting pitching -- and a marquee name that will draw more fans -- the Diamondbacks have offered a package of at least three players, including a major-leaguer. They would also want a 72-hour window to negotiate an extension with Johnson, who is owed $16 million in the final year of his contract. The Yankees, according to the official, don't want to pick up any of Johnson's salary.
...
The official said the San Diego Padres are also involved in trade discussions. It's believed that right-handed reliever Scott Linebrink could be the centerpiece of a deal.
Ralpho316
Dec 25 2006, 04:29 PM
I just cant believe this on so many levels.
1. 3 guys for someone who is 43 and coming off a terrible season with injuires
2. An extension? Seriously?
3. They are offering him 3 guys and the Yankees arent picking up any cash?
Wow...
WesternCorrespondent
Dec 25 2006, 05:38 PM
This trade CAN'T happen, can it?
I mean, the AZD-backs are willing to throw $16M+ down the toilet to get their only-ever NAME pitcher back, knowing he just had back surgery for the second time and his knees are shot? How do they expect to get him ready to pitch, wheel him out in his wheelchair when pitchers and catchers report?
Or maybe they don't plan to have RJ pitch at all. They'll just have him sit in the D-back's dugout every game and stand up every once in a while and take an imaginary curtain call -- something I'm sure he's gotten used to doing for the Yankees...

Pretty expensive lure for the casual D-back fan, and he ain't even eye candy...
RamallahSox
Dec 25 2006, 06:24 PM
QUOTE(WesternCorrespondent @ Dec 26 2006, 12:35 AM) [snapback]628964[/snapback]
I mean, the AZD-backs are willing to throw $16M+ down the toilet to get their only-ever NAME pitcher back, knowing he just had back surgery for the second time and his knees are shot? How do they expect to get him ready to pitch, wheel him out in his wheelchair when pitchers and catchers report?
Curt Schilling asks, "What about me?"
This is a bizarre trade proposal, if it's even true. For $16 mil, along with an extension, couldn't they have gone after one of the FA pitchers? If they really are willing to take on that kind of salary, why not go after Zito?
If this trade does happen, in just about any form, even with the MFY subsidizing RJ, I'll be glad that Josh is in the desert and not in the wings at Fenway.
EDIT: Heheh, "s a y s h i" converts to "slept with my mother"...cute.
2bshorty
Dec 25 2006, 08:23 PM
This is quite possibly the worst trade idea of the off-season. It's almost like the Curt Schilling deal flipped inside-out, complete with the 72-hour extension negotiating window and the package of players going out for one guy, except this time the package is probably good and the one guy sucks. Josh Byrnes was supposed to be in on the Schilling trade, too, except his wife was pregnant so they sent Jed Hoyer instead. Sounds like that was a good call for several reasons. Yikes, Josh. This is stupid. Don't do it, OK? You're helping the Yankees and screwing yourself at the same time.
WesternCorrespondent
Dec 25 2006, 09:36 PM
QUOTE(RamallahSox @ Dec 25 2006, 03:21 PM) [snapback]628968[/snapback]
Curt Schilling asks, "What about me?"
I had an inkling when I typed that, that I was probably forgetting something...
nhyankeefan
Dec 26 2006, 07:43 AM
I can't believe the level of interest Johnson is generating. Apparently in addition to AZ, the Pads, Giants and Angels have talked to the Yanks about him. The fact that the Yanks wouldn't have to throw in money is staggering.
QUOTE
San Diego right now appears to be the most likely destination for the five-time Cy Young Award winner, but the Dodgers, Angels and Diamondbacks are all said to be in the mix. One of the officials, familiar with the ongoing discussions, used the phrase "several bona fide offers" to describe what the Yankees are mulling and said the Yankees probably would not have to include any money.
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball...6p-406772c.html
warning track power
Dec 26 2006, 11:16 AM
I'm really hoping no one does the Yanks a favor and takes RJ - don't bail them out of another bad contract AND give them prospects in return. Hopefully it's just Cashman going through the motions of trading him in order to placate RJ and his desire to move closer to home.
yazgoesbacklooksupitsgone
Dec 26 2006, 11:20 AM
QUOTE(nhyankeefan @ Dec 26 2006, 07:40 AM) [snapback]629018[/snapback]
I can't believe the level of interest Johnson is generating. Apparently in addition to AZ, the Pads, Giants and Angels have talked to the Yanks about him. The fact that the Yanks wouldn't have to throw in money is staggering.
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball...6p-406772c.htmlCripes, that's crazy. I can understand why the Yankees would be looking to shop him, but why would anyone buy?
He's 43, coming off back surgery, has bad knees and was on the whole crappy last year. He won 17 games last year, allowing 5 runs a start. Can the Snakes, Pads, Giants and Angels match the Yankees offense when RJ starts?
QUOTE
The Dodgers' aggressive GM, Ned Colletti, already has signed Jason Schmidt for the front of his rotation and his interest may be in part to keep Johnson away from the division-rival Padres.
- daily news
If I'm Colletti, I'm not trying to keep him away from the Pads, I'm praying it comes to pass.
alskor
Dec 26 2006, 02:16 PM
Why is this trade so hard to believe(from the D-Back perspective)? The major leaguer is probably salary going back. The thing is, RJ isn't that bad. Even though he's fallen far off what he was... what he was was a HOFer. The injuries are a concern, yes. The issue is he no longer can carry a pitching staff; he's no longer an "Ace." He's still can be a very productive member of your pitching staff.
I personally think the Yankees are getting too cute and getting themselves in serious trouble. Thier pitching is seriously suspect to me. They need RJ, even at his reduced level.
The only way this move makes sense is if Clemens returns to NY. I can't see that... if they do, they really sold out on the no contract perks, team comes first thing. Plus, Clemens only will pitch a portion of the season... As much as I love facing the Unit, I kind of would like to see this trade and see the Yankees get caught real short on starters.
StuckInChiTown
Dec 26 2006, 03:32 PM
QUOTE(alskor @ Dec 26 2006, 04:13 PM) [snapback]629066[/snapback]
Why is this trade so hard to believe(from the D-Back perspective)? The major leaguer is probably salary going back. The thing is, RJ isn't that bad. Even though he's fallen far off what he was... what he was was a HOFer. The injuries are a concern, yes. The issue is he no longer can carry a pitching staff; he's no longer an "Ace." He's still can be a very productive member of your pitching staff.
I personally think the Yankees are getting too cute and getting themselves in serious trouble. Thier pitching is seriously suspect to me. They need RJ, even at his reduced level.
The only way this move makes sense is if Clemens returns to NY. I can't see that... if they do, they really sold out on the no contract perks, team comes first thing. Plus, Clemens only will pitch a portion of the season... As much as I love facing the Unit, I kind of would like to see this trade and see the Yankees get caught real short on starters.
I'd have to think that if they dealt 16 million dollars worth of salary they'd pursue another starter. If so, they would not be real short on starters. Chances are they'd be a lot younger.
I think the surprise is really at the market. If I had told you two years ago, after the Yankees got RJ that he would be 43 coming off back surgery and posting an era of 5.00 they would be able to fathom trading him without eating a big chunk of salary you would have likely laughed at me. I know I would have.
Imgran
Dec 26 2006, 04:18 PM
What starter could they pursue who would give them what even the 2006 RJ gave them?
alskor
Dec 26 2006, 04:26 PM
QUOTE(StuckInChiTown @ Dec 26 2006, 03:29 PM) [snapback]629078[/snapback]
I'd have to think that if they dealt 16 million dollars worth of salary they'd pursue another starter. If so, they would not be real short on starters. Chances are they'd be a lot younger.
I think the surprise is really at the market. If I had told you two years ago, after the Yankees got RJ that he would be 43 coming off back surgery and posting an era of 5.00 they would be able to fathom trading him without eating a big chunk of salary you would have likely laughed at me. I know I would have.
They wouldnt be able to get a starter back in trade, so that leaves:
1) Clemens - who may not want to come and won't/can't pitch a full year
2) Zito - who is a downgrade from Johnson, although he at least is likely to make most of his starts.
Color me unimpressed.
Mike LansWho
Dec 26 2006, 04:30 PM
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/story/483260p-406772c.htmlLooks like the Dodgers, Angels and Padres also have their hats in the ring.
QUOTE
In exchange for Johnson, it's possible the Yankees could be looking at San Diego reliever Scott Linebrink, a righthander they've always liked.
This would be quite a move if the Yankees could pull it off without having to pay anything. Not that they needed to get rid of Johnson to sign Zito, but this should help matters. Oh, and by the way, this makes the backend of their bullpen pretty much as good as it gets in the American League. I have a feeling that a lot of the names that got tossed around during the Manny trade speculation frenzy will pop up again for RJ. Things will get interesting.
BostonSox37
Dec 26 2006, 04:33 PM
QUOTE(alskor @ Dec 26 2006, 04:23 PM) [snapback]629087[/snapback]
They wouldnt be able to get a starter back in trade, so that leaves:
1) Clemens - who may not want to come and won't/can't pitch a full year
2) Zito - who is a downgrade from Johnson, although he at least is likely to make most of his starts.
Color me unimpressed.
Do you really think that over the next few years, a 43 year old Randy Johnson with bad knees coming off of back surgery will be a better pitcher than 28 year old Barry Zito?
Megas Alexandros
Dec 26 2006, 10:35 PM
QUOTE(Imgran @ Dec 26 2006, 04:15 PM) [snapback]629083[/snapback]
What starter could they pursue who would give them what even the 2006 RJ gave them?
Darrell Rasner.
I mean we are talking about an 88 ERA+.
alskor
Dec 27 2006, 05:00 AM
QUOTE(BostonSox37 @ Dec 26 2006, 04:30 PM) [snapback]629089[/snapback]
Do you really think that over the next few years, a 43 year old Randy Johnson with bad knees coming off of back surgery will be a better pitcher than 28 year old Barry Zito?
I think Zito is far closer to an average starter than you would imagine. His peripherals are in a disturbing decline over the past few years. His success has in large part been due to his expansive home ballpark. He is NOT a great pitcher. He is an above average starter who gets hit a good bit on days he can't throw his curve for strikes. The greatest thing recommending Zito is his durability. In that respect he would be a big upgrade over the ailing Unit.
B/c I expect Johnson to retire I think Zito will have more value over the next few years. I would expect RJ to perform about as well next year, though I think if Unit stays healthy(which is no sure thing) he will be better. RJ was fairly unlucky last year.
Signing Zito to me, is a lot like signing Pavano... I would be happy to see them do it b/c they would be expending a tremendous amount of money to lock up a guy with a limited ceiling. I am terribly unimpressed by Barry Zito.
Red Sox Fan2
Dec 27 2006, 03:48 PM
I hope RJ gets dealt to SD for Scott Linebrink. He's a 30 year old right handed reliever and had a REC 7-4 | SV 2 | ERA 3.57 | WHIP 1.22 while opponents batted .243 against him. Color me as unimpressed with Scott Linebrink, especially with the Yankees thin rotation. Even if the MFY's sign an average SP in Barry Zito for $100mil that leaves them unable to acquire real SP talent next year with Zambrano on the market.
Manny's ps2
Dec 27 2006, 03:55 PM
QUOTE(Red Sox Fan2 @ Dec 27 2006, 04:45 PM) [snapback]629260[/snapback]
I hope RJ gets dealt to SD for Scott Linebrink. He's a 30 year old right handed reliever and had a REC 7-4 | SV 2 | ERA 3.57 | WHIP 1.22 while opponents batted .243 against him. Color me as unimpressed with Scott Linebrink, especially with the Yankees thin rotation. Even if the MFY's sign an average SP in Barry Zito for $100mil that leaves them unable to acquire real SP talent next year with Zambrano on the market.
I agree SF2,,,I think Linebrink is severely overrated. When the Sox were talking about getting him I was unimpressed and was hoping if they did get him it would be for abe alvarez or his equivalent...I.E Junk. He could be a decent set up man...but the NL West is no indication of dominance in the AL East.
Red Sox Fan2
Dec 27 2006, 04:02 PM
QUOTE(Manny's ps2 @ Dec 27 2006, 03:52 PM) [snapback]629263[/snapback]
I agree SF2,,,I think Linebrink is severely overrated. When the Sox were talking about getting him I was unimpressed and was hoping if they did get him it would be for abe alvarez or his equivalent...I.E Junk. He could be a decent set up man...but the NL West is no indication of dominance in the AL East.
Not to mention when your dominating reliever with the SD Padres.
Sanez failed when he came back to the AL East, Embree had a resurgence after failing with the Sox and Spanks, and Cla Meredith went on to throw a club record for consecutive scoreless innings.
Than again junk for junk with Linebrink and RJ. Only RJ is more valuable to the Spanks for depth reasons.
....Than again isn't Aaron Small still hanging out in AAA Trenton?
Imgran
Dec 27 2006, 04:07 PM
QUOTE(Red Sox Fan2 @ Dec 27 2006, 03:45 PM) [snapback]629260[/snapback]
I hope RJ gets dealt to SD for Scott Linebrink. He's a 30 year old right handed reliever and had a REC 7-4 | SV 2 | ERA 3.57 | WHIP 1.22 while opponents batted .243 against him. Color me as unimpressed with Scott Linebrink, especially with the Yankees thin rotation. Even if the MFY's sign an average SP in Barry Zito for $100mil that leaves them unable to acquire real SP talent next year with Zambrano on the market.
I have absolutely no doubt that the Cubs will do everything in their power to re-sign Zambrano. Unless the Soriano contract has mortgaged their future even farther than I think it has, he'll stay in Chicago. The Cubs ain't exactly a small market team, after all. Zambrano is only on the market by courtesy unless he hates Chicago enough to bail out on a good contract offer from them.
BostonSox37
Dec 27 2006, 04:13 PM
QUOTE(alskor @ Dec 27 2006, 04:57 AM) [snapback]629172[/snapback]
I think Zito is far closer to an average starter than you would imagine. His peripherals are in a disturbing decline over the past few years. His success has in large part been due to his expansive home ballpark. He is NOT a great pitcher. He is an above average starter who gets hit a good bit on days he can't throw his curve for strikes. The greatest thing recommending Zito is his durability. In that respect he would be a big upgrade over the ailing Unit.
B/c I expect Johnson to retire I think Zito will have more value over the next few years. I would expect RJ to perform about as well next year, though I think if Unit stays healthy(which is no sure thing) he will be better. RJ was fairly unlucky last year.
Signing Zito to me, is a lot like signing Pavano... I would be happy to see them do it b/c they would be expending a tremendous amount of money to lock up a guy with a limited ceiling. I am terribly unimpressed by Barry Zito.
I never said Zito would be great. I don't think highly of Zito at all, and I agree with you that he is not a great pitcher and he may be just slightly above average. Having said that, what makes you believe that Randy Johnson would be able to give the Yankees anything NEAR league average. He was terrible last season, and now he is a year older and coming off back surgery which at the very least will cause him to miss some of ST if not the beginning of the season. If he can give the Yanks league average, I'd be shocked.
Imgran
Dec 27 2006, 05:53 PM
RJ actually wasn't as bad as all that. Sure, he had a poor ERA, but his periphs were pretty good (7+k/9, 3k/bb), he made all his starts, and he managed 200 innings. He also averaged more than 6 IP's per start and managed 2 complete games and 17 wins. He also had Beckett kinda luck this year which didn't help.
He's significantly above league average this year ERA notwithstanding. There's a whole bunch of pitchers who would die for a year like RJ just had at age 43.
What he isn't is an ace. What he is is a solid #3 starter at worst even as knocked about as he was last year. I really expect RJ's ERA to be somewhere in the low 4's next year and at WORST for him to be an acceptable starting pitcher providing a lot of league average innings.
Mystic Merlin
Dec 27 2006, 06:22 PM
QUOTE(Imgran @ Dec 27 2006, 05:50 PM) [snapback]629293[/snapback]
RJ actually wasn't as bad as all that. Sure, he had a poor ERA, but his periphs were pretty good (7+k/9, 3k/bb), he made all his starts, and he managed 200 innings. He also averaged more than 6 IP's per start and managed 2 complete games and 17 wins. He also had Beckett kinda luck this year which didn't help.
He's significantly above league average this year ERA notwithstanding. There's a whole bunch of pitchers who would die for a year like RJ just had at age 43.
What he isn't is an ace. What he is is a solid #3 starter at worst even as knocked about as he was last year. I really expect RJ's ERA to be somewhere in the low 4's next year and at WORST for him to be an acceptable starting pitcher providing a lot of league average innings.
RJ's problem was that he gave up a ton of home runs with runners on base. His peripherals were certainly not terrible, but his WHIP was a full .113 higher in '06 than it was in '05. Coupled with the fact he gave up 28 home runs, and you have his high ERA. Yeah, this is probably oversimplified calculus, but I think it helps explain RJ's performance.
Imgran
Dec 27 2006, 06:55 PM
.. which still, even taking all that into account, wasn't half bad.
WesternCorrespondent
Dec 27 2006, 07:23 PM
You can't fault the Yanks/Cashman for negotiating like Scott Boras. One hopes this "package" gets whittled down a bit, even (shock!) making the Yanks pay some of RJ's salary. Yikes!
From the East Valley Tribune (Phoenix) today:
QUOTE
The New York Yankees are seeking a package of three young pitchers from the Diamondbacks for Randy Johnson, including at least one reliever, according to a source with knowledge of the negotiations.
The Yankees have expressed interest in right-handed setup man Brandon Medders, the source said, in addition to several of the five starting pitchers that the D-Backs consider candidates for the two available spots in their 2007 rotation – Edgar Gonzalez, Enrique Gonzalez, Dustin Nippert, Ross Ohlendorf and Micah Owings.
WesternCorrespondent
Dec 27 2006, 07:54 PM
Interesting commentary on the above excerpt at
an AZ-D'backs blog under the title "The Johnson Arms Race"...
The most interesting part was this:
QUOTE
Ironically, if we got Johnson, we wouldn't have to pay him $16m, even at full price, since $1.5m is apparently deferred until 2010. Heck, we can just add it to the debt, since reports say we still owe him $40m from his last stint here, part of the deferred salary lump that we're paying off. But there's an interesting point brought up by Mister T in the comments: would Johnson be happy being the #2 in Arizona, behind reigning Cy Young winner, Brandon Webb? He was the Opening Day starter last season for the Yankees (as they thrashed Barry Zito, incidentally!). Does he have the humility to watch Webb, with fifteen fewer years major-league experience, take that spot? Or will it eat away at him? He was never regarded as a great clubhouse presence to begin with, and with the young team we have here, that could be a crucial issue.
I think the opinions (including some 10-yr. old ones from my corner of the country) that RJ is a sullen brooding clubhouse presence with a tendency to be standoffish far outweigh the opinions that he's a positive clubhouse presence and a mentor and guiding light for younger pitchers. Remains to be seen if his back is improved enough to improve his personality...
RamallahSox
Dec 27 2006, 08:22 PM
I'm not worried about the Yankees dealing RJ to go after Zito. In fact, I hope that's what their plan is...
Huh. Red Sox fans hope the Yankees don't get Barry Zito, you say?
Barry Zito 3-Year Splits vs. Red Sox, 2004-2006
2-3, 6.45 ERA (7.20 at Fenway)
7 GS
38.2 IP
50 H
27 ER
30/22 K/BB
.309 BAA
Yeah. We wouldn't want that coming at us four or five times a year. Especially if it's instead of this guy:
Randy Johnson 3-year Splits vs. Red Sox, 2004-2006
7-1, 4.87 ERA
10 GS
61 IP
59 H
33 ER
64/32 K/BB
.252 BAA
Both relatively small sample sizes, obviously, but still.Courtesy of
Fire Joe Morgan
Love of Sox
Dec 27 2006, 08:37 PM
QUOTE(Red Sox Fan2 @ Dec 27 2006, 12:45 PM) [snapback]629260[/snapback]
I hope RJ gets dealt to SD for Scott Linebrink. He's a 30 year old right handed reliever and had a REC 7-4 | SV 2 | ERA 3.57 | WHIP 1.22 while opponents batted .243 against him. Color me as unimpressed with Scott Linebrink, especially with the Yankees thin rotation. Even if the MFY's sign an average SP in Barry Zito for $100mil that leaves them unable to acquire real SP talent next year with Zambrano on the market.
The problem with that is that Linebrink would only be one piece. Cesar Carillo and "a bat" are rumored to be part of the deal.
WesternCorrespondent
Dec 28 2006, 05:50 PM
QUOTE(RamallahSox @ Dec 27 2006, 05:19 PM) [snapback]629319[/snapback]
I'm not worried about the Yankees dealing RJ to go after Zito. In fact, I hope that's what their plan is...
Huh. Red Sox fans hope the Yankees don't get Barry Zito, you say?
Barry Zito 3-Year Splits vs. Red Sox, 2004-2006
2-3, 6.45 ERA (7.20 at Fenway); 7 GS; 38.2 IP; 50 H; 27 ER; 30/22 K/BB; .309 BAA
Yeah. We wouldn't want that coming at us four or five times a year. Especially if it's instead of this guy:
Randy Johnson 3-year Splits vs. Red Sox, 2004-2006
7-1, 4.87 ERA; 10 GS; 61 IP; 59 H; 33 ER; 64/32 K/BB; .252 BAA
Both relatively small sample sizes, obviously, but still.
The cynic in me says RJ ain't goin' anywhere now that Zito's moved to the NL West (watch Zito's 2007 season crash and burn if they don't get Bonds out of the OF there).
I wonder if RJ's vaguely worded hint about wanting to be closer to his family, if not acted on, will precipitate another year of sulking and tanking the way he did in 1998?
Red Sox Fan2
Dec 28 2006, 06:18 PM
QUOTE(Love of Sox @ Dec 27 2006, 08:34 PM) [snapback]629320[/snapback]
The problem with that is that Linebrink would only be one piece. Cesar Carillo and "a bat" are rumored to be part of the deal.
I can't find much information about Cesar Carrillo other than he is a 22 year old RHP who last year had a 4.34 ERA 0.98 WHIP 8.1 H/9 2.2 BB/9 7.1/K9 1.2/HR9 and had 46% GB and .276 BABIP at AA last season.
Decent, but not great. Anyone have any idea on what he throws or the velocity of his pitches?
Still Cesar Carrillo+Linebrink+"a bat"(oxymoron for SD?) is vastly over-paying for RJ, but the package isn't so exciting.
Love of Sox
Dec 28 2006, 08:12 PM
QUOTE(Red Sox Fan2 @ Dec 28 2006, 03:15 PM) [snapback]629522[/snapback]
I can't find much information about Cesar Carrillo other than he is a 22 year old RHP who last year had a 4.34 ERA 0.98 WHIP 8.1 H/9 2.2 BB/9 7.1/K9 1.2/HR9 and had 46% GB and .276 BABIP at AA last season.
Decent, but not great. Anyone have any idea on what he throws or the velocity of his pitches?
Still Cesar Carrillo+Linebrink+"a bat"(oxymoron for SD?) is vastly over-paying for RJ, but the package isn't so exciting.
Yeah, I questioned the "bat" thing myself after it was reported, they don't have much at Portland except for a bunch of AAAA guys like McAnulty, Leone and Sledge. Here is a
Wikipedia page on Carillo who could end up being a huge bust or a budding star.
buffs4444
Dec 28 2006, 09:39 PM
Cesar Carillo was the Padres top prospect last year according to Baseball America. From the review:
QUOTE
He should be a fixture in San Diego’s rotation for years to come, possibly as a No. 2 starter.
Fastball is 91-94mph (top is 96mph), curve, change all have the potential to be plus pitches.
If he were in the deal for RJ, and the Padres had to pay all of the $16M for RJ, I'd be shocked.....
Mystic Merlin
Dec 31 2006, 01:37 AM
A lurker at SoSH, TBONE95860, posted the following at 12:18 AM:
"According to NYYNEWS.com
UPDATE: BREAKING NEWS! I have just been told that the Yankees and Diamondbacks have reached an agreement. Apparently the Yankees will eat around 2 - 4 million of Randy's contract and will receive Dustin Nippert, Micah Owings, and a third player that could be Luis Vizcaino."
Obviously, take this with a grain of salt.
Jermaine Van Buren Fan
Dec 31 2006, 10:27 AM
Josh simply wouldn't do this - it's got to be all Moorad.
Love of Sox
Dec 31 2006, 10:47 AM
QUOTE(Jermaine Van Buren Fan @ Dec 31 2006, 07:24 AM) [snapback]629972[/snapback]
Josh simply wouldn't do this - it's got to be all Moorad.
Moorad must be the D-Back's equivalent of LL to many of you guys. Geez.
buffs4444
Dec 31 2006, 12:34 PM
Nippert isn't a stud prospect, and Owings profiles as an arm out of the pen. Trading them for a #2 starter isn't a bad deal. Especially if re-acquiring him means they can re-structure the remaining $40M they owe RJ right now.
Red Sox Fan2
Dec 31 2006, 04:47 PM
QUOTE(buffs4444 @ Dec 31 2006, 12:31 PM) [snapback]629993[/snapback]
Nippert isn't a stud prospect, and Owings profiles as an arm out of the pen. Trading them for a #2 starter isn't a bad deal. Especially if re-acquiring him means they can re-structure the remaining $40M they owe RJ right now.
This will again though put Cashman over the top if he can acquire 3 prospects and some salary for a 43 year old pitcher with a bad back. Even if they aren't worth much, it's still better than going with a 1-year pitcher with a 5+ ERA.
chicowalker
Dec 31 2006, 06:00 PM
QUOTE(Red Sox Fan2 @ Dec 31 2006, 01:44 PM) [snapback]630082[/snapback]
This will again though put Cashman over the top if he can acquire 3 prospects and some salary for a 43 year old pitcher with a bad back. Even if they aren't worth much, it's still better than going with a 1-year pitcher with a 5+ ERA.
For most teams, to whom Johnson's salary would be a significant constraint on other moves, I'd agree. However, despite all his problems last year, I'd rather see the yankees without Randy Johnson than with him. Of course, it depends on the value received in any trade. If they get top-tier prospects, sure, I'd prefer such a deal not to happen. (For ex, at nyyfans, there's been a lot of talk about Connor Jackson or a good pitching prospect whose name I forget.) If we're talking guys who are unlikely to have much impact or trade value (should the Yanks look to flip them), though, I'm all for them making that deal.
Lou Duffys Cliff
Dec 31 2006, 06:32 PM
From Rotoworld
QUOTE
Randy Johnson-S-Yankees Dec. 31 - 1:15 pm et
The Yankees trade talks with the Diamondbacks have slowed over the structuring of a potential contract extension for Randy Johnson, a person with knowledge of the negotiations told the New York Daily News.
The D'Backs apparently would like to sign Johnson for 2008, but they want to be creative about it. For one thing, they have only about $10 million to spend in 2007 and Johnson is due $16 million. The Yankees could help there in return for more talent. Arizona could also try to do away with some of the $40 million in deferred money Johnson is still owed by the team, with a future stake in ownership one possibility. A trade remains likely if Johnson wants it to happen. According to the East Valley Tribune, the Yankees could settle for two players from a group of four pitchers: Brandon Medders, Dustin Nippert, Ross Ohlendorf and Micah Owings.
Source: New York Daily News
To me this is less about the DBacks acquiring talent than it is to sell more tickets and to get out from the $40M in defered money they still owe RJ. I also wouldn't be surprised if AZ inserted some Clemens type clauses in the contract to allow him to spend more time with his family in exchange for financial consideration.
I also see no way that Conor Jackson, Carlos Quentin or Chris Young are involved in this deal unless the CFY are picking up considerable money in the trade. And if one of those players is involved, there is no way a top pitching prospect would be added as well. That would be complete robbery by the CFY.
bigbilly
Jan 3 2007, 10:41 AM
From today's Bergen Record, looks like the package the Yanks want is Owings and Medders:
QUOTE
A two-for-one trade involving Randy Johnson could net the Yankees a future front-line starter.
Diamondbacks right-handed prospect Micah Owings is the most intriguing name involved in discussions that would send Johnson back to Arizona, though talks reportedly have been stalled over money issues.
According to one report from Arizona, the Yankees and Diamondbacks already have agreed to a package of two pitchers for Johnson, who is set to make $16 million next season, the final year of his contract.
The Yankees were reluctant to absorb any portion of that salary unless Arizona kicked in one or more prospects on the Yanks' wish list. Also at issue is the $40 million in deferred payments Arizona still owes Johnson, and the Big Unit's apparent request for a one-year contract extension.
As of Tuesday evening, the Yankees had not granted the customary 72-hour window (as they allowed Detroit in the Gary Sheffield trade) for Arizona to negotiate with Johnson's agent.
Johnson has a full no-trade clause, and recently indicated to Yankees general manager Brian Cashman that he'd like to pitch closer to his Phoenix-area home.
Cashman did not return a phone message Tuesday.
Money issues aside, the sentiment remained that the Yankees were committed to moving Johnson back to Arizona, and that Owings and reliever Brandon Medders could arrive in return.
According to one National League scout, Owings is better than any of the three pitchers the Yankees received from the Tigers for Sheffield -- including right-hander Humberto Sanchez, who was the key to the deal.
Sanchez, 23, went a combined 10-6, with a 2.63 ERA in Class AA and Class AAA stints last season, with 129 strikeouts and 47 walks in 123 innings. But the right-hander has had elbow problems.
"If he were [as] good [as people say], he'd be in the big leagues already," the scout said of Sanchez.
Owings, 24, went 10-0 with a 3.70 ERA after his promotion to Class AAA during 2006, and had a combined 130 strikeouts and 51 walks in 1622/3 innings. Like Sanchez, Owings could be ready to contribute in the big leagues as a starter or setup reliever this season.
One NL scout likens the 6-foot-5, 220-pound Owings to the Mets' Aaron Heilman, though Owings is considered to be more aggressive in the strike zone.
http://www.northjersey.com/page.php?qstr=e...2Y3dnFlZUVFeXk2
buffs4444
Jan 3 2007, 11:29 AM
Josh Byrnes ripping off the Yanks......good times!!!
Sox Sweep Again
Jan 4 2007, 08:35 AM
From
Newsday:YankeesBig Unit to Arizona all but finalizedA source close to the situation has told Newsday that Randy Johnson has already agreed to a one-year extension with the Diamondbacks.
BY KEN DAVIDOFF
Newsday Staff Writer
January 4, 2007, 12:02 AM EST
Randy Johnson is now on board with his trade back to Arizona. All that's left is for the Yankees and Diamondbacks to work out their minor differences, and the Big Unit's departure from the Bronx will be complete.
The Yankees and Arizona have advanced far enough in their discussions that Johnson has already agreed, in principle, to a contract extension for 2008 with the Diamondbacks, two people familiar with the situation told Newsday. The trade could take another two or three days to finish, given its complexities.
CTLovesTheSox
Jan 4 2007, 04:56 PM
Sweeney Murti, who covers the Yankees for WFAN just reported Johnson to the D-Backs for Luis Vizacaino, RHP Steven Jackson, RHP Ross Ohlendorf, and SS Alberto Gonzalez.
Red Sox Fan2
Jan 4 2007, 05:06 PM
QUOTE(CTLovesTheSox @ Jan 4 2007, 04:53 PM) [snapback]631342[/snapback]
Sweeney Murti, who covers the Yankees for WFAN just reported Johnson to the D-Backs for Luis Vizacaino, RHP Steven Jackson, RHP Ross Ohlendorf, and SS Alberto Gonzalez.
Please tell me they are B level prospects at best
A 43 year old pitcher who just had back surgery, costs about 16mil, and had a horrid year last year just fetched 3 prospects. Wow.
CTLovesTheSox
Jan 4 2007, 05:13 PM
QUOTE(Red Sox Fan2 @ Jan 4 2007, 05:03 PM) [snapback]631350[/snapback]
Please tell me they are B level prospects at best
A 43 year old pitcher who just had back surgery, costs about 16mil, and had a horrid year last year just fetched 3 prospects. Wow.
All were in Double A last season;
Ohlendorf; 10-8, 3.25 ERA 125K in 177.2 IP. 15 wild pitches.
Jackson; 8-11, 2.65 ERA 125K in 149.2 IP
Gonzalez; .290/.356/.392 6HR 50 RBI
Red Sox Fan2
Jan 4 2007, 05:16 PM
QUOTE(CTLovesTheSox @ Jan 4 2007, 05:10 PM) [snapback]631352[/snapback]
All were in Double A last season;
Ohlendorf; 10-8, 3.25 ERA 125K in 177.2 IP. 15 wild pitches.
Jackson; 8-11, 2.65 ERA 125K in 149.2 IP
Gonzalez; .290/.356/.392 6HR 50 RBI
Ages?
CTLovesTheSox
Jan 4 2007, 05:17 PM
Jackson 25 in March, Ohlendorf is 24, Gonzalez will be 25 in April.
jenny
Jan 4 2007, 05:23 PM
QUOTE(buffs4444 @ Jan 3 2007, 01:26 PM) [snapback]630800[/snapback]
Josh Byrnes ripping off the Yanks......good times!!!
Is it a rip off? I don' tknow much about these prospects.
Go Josh!
Red Sox Fan2
Jan 4 2007, 05:32 PM
QUOTE(CTLovesTheSox @ Jan 4 2007, 05:14 PM) [snapback]631356[/snapback]
Jackson 25 in March, Ohlendorf is 24, Gonzalez will be 25 in April.
So they are acquiring Jackson who will be 26 and pitching in his first season at AAA, Ohlendorf who seems to have control issues at age 24-25, and Gonzalez who will be 26 while entering his first season at AAA with as much power as Mark Loretta. Does he play "GG caliber" defense?
Not a bunch that would excite me greatly though Jackson did have some pretty gaudy numbers at AA last season.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.