Report: Joe Blanton traded to Red Sox
Phillies shedding some payroll
#1
Mike LansWho
Posted 14 December 2010 - 09:01 AM
#2
Manny's PS2
Posted 14 December 2010 - 09:04 AM
#4
Mike LansWho
Posted 14 December 2010 - 09:15 AM
#5
BigSlick
Posted 14 December 2010 - 09:19 AM
This post has been edited by BigSlick: 14 December 2010 - 09:22 AM
#6
Hail Cesar
Posted 14 December 2010 - 09:37 AM
BigSlick, on 14 December 2010 - 09:19 AM, said:
I don't think that's too far from the truth. The Phils know that the Red Sox wanted to keep Cliff Lee away from the Yankees. If it takes absorbing a contract that they can handle, then it's a benefit to them. Problem is that they will likely be well over the luxury tax this year if they acquire Blanton especially because they still need another bullpen piece or two.
#7
Mike LansWho
Posted 14 December 2010 - 09:38 AM
BigSlick, on 14 December 2010 - 09:19 AM, said:
As far as conspiracy theories go, that one actually makes a little bit of sense. The only problem is that it totally ignores the fact that the Red Sox could have facilitated their World Series opponent. Imagine if the Red Sox actually helped the Phillies get Cliff Lee just to keep him away from the Yankees only to have to face him and Halladay a couple times each in the World Series. I know that Lee was beaten twice by the Giants this past season, but it's still kind of scary.
#8
Manny's PS2
Posted 14 December 2010 - 09:47 AM
edit: I see, in all MLW's ramblings he mentioned this. Sorry, d-bags.
Sorry holiday drinking season is screwing up my thinking more than usual.
This post has been edited by Manny's PS2: 14 December 2010 - 10:25 AM
#9
Mike LansWho
Posted 14 December 2010 - 09:53 AM
Hail Cesar, on 14 December 2010 - 09:37 AM, said:
According to some estimates I've seen (after figuring in Crawford's deal and arbitration raises) if the Red Sox take on all of Blanton's contract and keep what they already have, they would still be something like $10M-$12M under the tax threshold.
#10
VoteRiceIn
Posted 14 December 2010 - 09:57 AM
Hail Cesar, on 14 December 2010 - 09:37 AM, said:
Blanton has 2 years left: $8.5m in 2011 & $8.5m in 2012
Matsuzak has 2 years left: $10m in 2011 & $10m in 2012
Philly saves $ by dumping Blanton & in turn the Sox save $ when they move Dice-K to the left coast (LA or Seattle appear to have interest) and turn Dice-Ks spot in the rotation into a spot in the bullpen.
#11
Mike LansWho
Posted 14 December 2010 - 10:04 AM
VoteRiceIn, on 14 December 2010 - 09:57 AM, said:
Matsuzak has 2 years left: $10m in 2011 & $10m in 2012
Philly saves $ by dumping Blanton & in turn the Sox save $ when they move Dice-K to the left coast (LA or Seattle appear to have interest) and turn Dice-Ks spot in the rotation into a spot in the bullpen.
Seems like an awful lot of trouble to downgrade the rotation just to save $1.5M in AAV.
#12
VoteRiceIn
Posted 14 December 2010 - 11:21 AM
Mike LansWho, on 14 December 2010 - 10:04 AM, said:
Not if you buy into the conspiracy theory that Theo & co. were in discussion w/ the Phills about moving Blanton contingent upon them landing Cliff Lee. Also, I think the Dice-K being better than Blanton argument is at least debatable. If the net result is Dice-K + $1.5m for Blanton + a quality bullpen arm, I'm OK, which should allow Theo & Co. to sleep better at night.
edit: Scott Lauber tweet - Blanton-to-Boston never was serious
This post has been edited by VoteRiceIn: 14 December 2010 - 11:38 AM
#13
Mike LansWho
Posted 14 December 2010 - 11:48 AM
VoteRiceIn, on 14 December 2010 - 11:21 AM, said:
I don't buy into that.
Quote
This part I do agree with. It is hyperbole on my part to consider Blanton over Matsuzaka as a downgrade. Over the past 4 years the two are essentially the same guy.
Quote
I'm not surprised, even though two fairly respectable reporters broke the story as being done. It also would not surprise me if somebody came back later and said that the two sides are still talking.
#14
VASoxFan38
Posted 14 December 2010 - 04:47 PM
Mike LansWho, on 14 December 2010 - 09:01 AM, said:
I heard this was dead around lunch, actually. Anyone know if this was revived?
#15
Kid T
Posted 15 December 2010 - 12:35 AM
VoteRiceIn, on 14 December 2010 - 09:57 AM, said:
Why does everyone seem to forget about Dice-K's no trade clause?
BigSlick, on 14 December 2010 - 09:19 AM, said:
I think some of the national media is engaged in this angle. Nice to see that the Red Sox braintrust is in their heads. Wonder what Cashman and the Steinbrenners are considering for a response (besides signing Mark Prior).
#16
Mike LansWho
Posted 15 December 2010 - 08:14 AM
#17
Hail Cesar
Posted 15 December 2010 - 09:57 AM
#19
Manny's PS2
Posted 15 December 2010 - 10:54 AM
Sayonara,
MPS2

Sign In »
Register Now!
Help

MultiQuote